Kim Kardashian Posing Nude on the November Cover of W Magazine

Kim Kardashian's Naked W Cover—Sexy or Unnecessary?

October 12, 2010

by POPSUGAR Celebrity AU 20

With the help of three strategically placed red bars, Kim Kardashian boldly poses nude on the November cover of W magazine. The annual art issue goes behind the scenes with Kim and her growing empire of reality TV shows. Inside the magazine, the Keeping Up With the Kardashians star bares even more in shots where she's naked dipped in silver paint. In the past she's expressed regrets about posing for Playboy, but she still seems eager to strip down. With so much of her time spent in front of the camera and the emphasis put on her body, what do you think about the photos—really sexy or really unnecessary?

Kim Kardashian W Magazine

20 Comments

warm toastypuppy

warm toastypuppy 2 years 29 weeks

I am still trying to figure out what it is these sisters do ,are they famous for being famous, seems like it to me any way! All of the sisters have had plastic surgery and some freshing up done. They have the money and the time as they do nothing else to get procedures done in between pretending they run a clothing line in florida and magazine shots. 98 % of the female population cant live and spend like they do so many people find it fascinating to look into their life style.The bigger problem is they come from a family that had it all (money wise any way) but Kourtney and Kim have major co -dependency issues with the men they pick to be with. Look at Kourtney with Scott . She should have kicked him to the curb long ago. He is abusive, self center and has a chemical dependency . They may have knock out bodies and a cozy life style but they dont know a thing about finding a partner that will treat them with decency and kindness. There are a lot of women with figures just as good or better and they are not plastering themselves on every mag cover that will sign them up.Kim seems to be the one who just has to do this and get attention for herself. Every time we see her it is in some state of being disrobed . Lets remember a bit of trivia their dad defended O.J. Simpson that right there goes to show me her dad didnt make the best choices he defended a man that couldnt have been more guilty . He defended him for the large amount of money he would get from O.J. Simpson

cholly4

cholly4 2 years 31 weeks

I know people say "If you got it, flaunt it" but there's a difference with showing your "stuff" every once in a while and showing it all the time! I personally think KK is pretty but it's becoming annoying now... I'm starting to feel like she craves attention so she does nothing but take off her clothes... I'm not going to be rude but I think she's trying too hard! We know you have a nice body, you dont have to broadcast it every two seconds.

2 years 31 weeks

Lolol! I like how it says "The Art Issue". It's not porn, its art! Of course :P

2 years 31 weeks

She looks like a wax statue at Madame Tussauds, not a real person. Her facial expression because she's sucking in her breath.

sandiinthecity 2 years 31 weeks

Yuck.

Glamorme 2 years 31 weeks

The body is nice but the face: we have seen better from Kim.

2 years 31 weeks

Over-exposed and same ol' same ol'. Kim is always taking off her clothing for money, nothing new here.

Smashboxchick 2 years 31 weeks

Unatttractive* OOPS!

Smashboxchick 2 years 31 weeks

She does look constipated. The facial expression is extremely attractiveness. Although, I must say her hairless body looks good.. but everyone has seen too much of her body, so I see no reason for her to continue doing these types of covers/photographs.

2 years 31 weeks

now i can die happy woohoo...i know what a hairless armenian looks like lol

wicca_08 2 years 31 weeks

She looks great; but, what's new?

Nicky5 2 years 31 weeks

She looks constipated.

lickety split 2 years 31 weeks

She's the least offensive of her tribe (to me). She likes the naked thing. Seems to sell, so.... It's her sister that's married to the basketball player that I just cannot stand. Kim: eh.

2 years 31 weeks

she WILL fade away. (paris hilton anyone)? these useless so called "stars" have a shelf life. fortunately for us. Yes she is a pretty woman, but I could care less about her. Too bad America is sooo celeb obsessed. Its one thing to be obsessed about REAl film stars/singers with REAL talent and staying power..but a girl who has just another reality show getting a major cover? its borderline appalling. and to think I thought the Julia Roberts and Angelina Jolie's were taking models jobs...but now reality stars are even taking legitimate celebrities jobs now? its pathetic. long gone are the days of supermodels sadly. Kim cannot model..

Louie 2 years 31 weeks

She does have a great body, but FFS this is getting ridiculous.

Studio16 2 years 31 weeks

Someone's going to call me a jealous cow, I just know it, but I think it needs to be said: The Kardashian sisters? Yeah, they're not that pretty. Sure, Kim has a good body, but honestly, the three of them have rather plain facial features. There's nothing extraordinarily beautiful about any of them.

babaloo 2 years 31 weeks

I'm eager to see her fade away. She's useless.

2 years 31 weeks

*clothes

2 years 31 weeks

Yeah, she looks great and a bit different - fresher - than usual (and not only because she's stark naked), but still... I'm over it. Put your close on and do something meaningful with your life for once, Kim! But I guess that's just too much to expect from the likes of her!

2 years 31 weeks

She has no talent or common sense. Wth else would she do? Poof! be gone slut season! I pray to GOD 2011 is the year of smart women!